References

• (1)
• Abe et al. (1996) Abe Y, Ayik S, Reinhard P G and Suraud E 1996 On stochastic approaches of nuclear dynamics Physics Reports 275(2), 49 – 196.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0370157396000038
• Adamian et al. (2016) Adamian G G, Antonenko N V, Lenske H, Tolokonnikov S V and Saperstein E E 2016 Isotopic trends of nuclear surface properties of spherical nuclei Phys. Rev. C 94, 054309.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.054309
• Afibuzzaman et al. (2018) Afibuzzaman M, Schuetrumpf B and Aktulga H M 2018 Scalable nuclear density functional theory with Sky3D Comput. Phys. Commun. 223, 34 – 44.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010465517303491
• Agbemava et al. (2017) Agbemava S E, Afanasjev A V, Ray D and Ring P 2017 Assessing theoretical uncertainties in fission barriers of superheavy nuclei Phys. Rev. C 95, 054324.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.054324
• Agbemava et al. (2019) Agbemava S E, Afanasjev A V, Taninah A and Gyawali A 2019 Extension of the nuclear landscape to hyperheavy nuclei Phys. Rev. C 99, 034316.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.034316
• Albertsson et al. (2020) Albertsson M, Carlsson B, Dössing T, Möller P, Randrup J and Åberg S 2020 Excitation energy partition in fission Physics Letters B 803, 135276.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269320300800
• Alhassid et al. (2008) Alhassid Y, Fang L and Nakada H 2008 Heavy deformed nuclei in the shell model Monte Carlo method Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 082501.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.082501
• Andreyev et al. (2013) Andreyev A N, Huyse M and Van Duppen P 2013 Colloquium: Beta-delayed fission of atomic nuclei Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1541–1559.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.85.1541
• Andreyev et al. (2017) Andreyev A N, Nishio K and Schmidt K H 2017 Nuclear fission: a review of experimental advances and phenomenology Rep. Prog. Phys. 81(1), 016301.
  https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aa82eb
• Anguiano et al. (2001) Anguiano M, Egido J and Robledo L 2001 Particle number projection with effective forces Nucl. Phys. A 696(3), 467 – 493.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947401012192
• Aritomo et al. (2014) Aritomo Y, Chiba S and Ivanyuk F 2014 Fission dynamics at low excitation energy Phys. Rev. C 90(5), 054609.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.054609
• Assié and Lacroix (2009) Assié M and Lacroix D 2009 Probing neutron correlations through nuclear breakup Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 202501.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.202501
• Ayik (2008) Ayik S 2008 A stochastic mean-field approach for nuclear dynamics Phys. Lett. B 658, 174.
  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2007.09.072
• Baldo et al. (2013) Baldo M, Robledo L M, Schuck P and Viñas X 2013 New Kohn-Sham density functional based on microscopic nuclear and neutron matter equations of state Phys. Rev. C 87(6), 064305.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.064305
• Balian and Vénéroni (1981) Balian R and Vénéroni M 1981 Time-dependent variational principle for predicting the expectation value of an observable Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1353–1356.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.1353
• Balian and Vénéroni (1984) Balian R and Vénéroni M 1984 Fluctuations in a time-dependent mean-field approach Physics Letters B 136(5), 301 – 306.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0370269384920082
• Banerjee et al. (2019) Banerjee K, Hinde D J, Dasgupta M, Simpson E C, Jeung D Y, Simenel C, Swinton-Bland B M A, Williams E, Carter I P, Cook K J, David H M, Düllmann C E, Khuyagbaatar J, Kindler B, Lommel B, Prasad E, Sengupta C, Smith J F, Vo-Phuoc K, Walshe J and Yakushev A 2019 Mechanisms suppressing superheavy element yields in cold fusion reactions Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 232503.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.232503
• Baran et al. (2008) Baran A, Bulgac A, Forbes M, Hagen G, Nazarewicz W, Schunck N and Stoitsov M 2008 Broyden’s method in nuclear structure calculations Phys. Rev. C 78(1), 014318.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.78.014318
• Baran et al. (2011) Baran A, Sheikh J A, Dobaczewski J, Nazarewicz W and Staszczak A 2011 Quadrupole collective inertia in nuclear fission: Cranking approximation Phys. Rev. C 84, 054321.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.054321
• Baranger and Vénéroni (1978) Baranger M and Vénéroni M 1978 An adiabatic time-dependent Hartree-Fock theory of collective motion in finite systems Annals of Physics 114(1), 123 – 200.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003491678902658
• Barrett et al. (1978) Barrett B R, Shlomo S and Weidenmüller H A 1978 Microscopic calculation of the form factors for deeply inelastic heavy-ion collisions within the statistical model Phys. Rev. C 17, 544–554.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.17.544
• Bartel et al. (1982) Bartel J, Quentin P, Brack M, Guet C and Håkansson H B 1982 Towards a better parametrisation of Skyrme-like effective forces: A critical study of the SkM force Nuclear Physics A 386(1), 79 – 100.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375947482904031
• Baye (2015) Baye D 2015 The Lagrange-mesh method Phys. Rep. 565, 1 – 107.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370157314004086
• Becker et al. (2017) Becker P, Davesne D, Meyer J, Navarro J and Pastore A 2017 Solution of Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov equations and fitting procedure using the N2LOSkyrme pseudopotential in spherical symmetry Phys. Rev. C 96, 044330.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.044330
• Behera et al. (2016) Behera B, Viñas X, Routray T R, Robledo L M, Centelles M and Pattnaik S P 2016 Deformation properties with a finite-range simple effective interaction Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 43(4), 045115.
  https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/43/4/045115
• Bender et al. (2009) Bender M, Duguet T and Lacroix D 2009 Particle-number restoration within the energy density functional formalism Phys. Rev. C 79, 044319.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.044319
• Bender et al. (2004) Bender M, Heenen P H and Bonche P 2004 Microscopic study of ${}^{240}\mathrm{Pu}$: Mean field and beyond Phys. Rev. C 70, 054304.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.70.054304
• Bender et al. (2003) Bender M, Heenen P H and Reinhard P G 2003 Self-consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 121–180.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.121
• Bender et al. (2019) Bender M, Schunck N, Ebran J P and Duguet T 2019 in ‘Energy Density Functional Methods for Atomic Nuclei’ 2053-2563 IOP Publishing pp. 3–1 to 3–78.
  http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2053-2563/aae0edch3
• Bennaceur (2020) Bennaceur K 2020. et al, code finres${}_{\mathrm{4}}$, to be submitted to Comput. Phys. Commun.
• Bennaceur et al. (2017) Bennaceur K, Idini A, Dobaczewski J, Dobaczewski P, Kortelainen M and Raimondi F 2017 Nonlocal energy density functionals for pairing and beyond-mean-field calculations J. Phys. G 44(4), 045106.
  https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/aa5fd7
• Berdichevsky et al. (1989) Berdichevsky D, Lukasiak A, Nörenberg W and Rozmej P 1989 Diabatic hindrance of heavy-ion fusion Nucl. Phys. A 502, 395 – 404.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375947489906787
• Berger et al. (1991) Berger J F, Girod M and Gogny D 1991 Time-dependent quantum collective dynamics applied to nuclear fission Comput. Phys. Comm. 63(1), 365.
  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(91)90263-K
• Bernard et al. (2019) Bernard R, Giuliani S A and Robledo L M 2019 Role of dynamic pairing correlations in fission dynamics Phys. Rev. C 99, 064301.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.064301
• Bernard et al. (2011) Bernard R, Goutte H, Gogny D and Younes W 2011 Microscopic and nonadiabatic Schrödinger equation derived from the generator coordinate method based on zero- and two-quasiparticle states Phys. Rev. C 84, 044308.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.044308
• Bernard et al. (2020) Bernard R N, Pillet N, Robledo L M and Anguiano M 2020 Description of the asymmetric to symmetric fission transition in the neutron-deficient thorium isotopes: Role of the tensor force Phys. Rev. C 101, 044615.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.044615
• Bertsch (2019) Bertsch G 2019 Reorientation in newly formed fission fragments. arXiv:1901.00928.
  https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.00928
• Bertsch (2020) Bertsch G F 2020 Schematic reaction-theory model for nuclear fission Phys. Rev. C 101, 034617.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.034617
• Bertsch, Kawano and Robledo (2019) Bertsch G F, Kawano T and Robledo L M 2019 Angular momentum of fission fragments Phys. Rev. C 99, 034603.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.034603
• Bertsch et al. (2015) Bertsch G F, Loveland W, Nazarewicz W and Talou P 2015 Benchmarking nuclear fission theory J. Phys. G 42(7), 077001.
  https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/42/7/077001
• Bertsch and Robledo (2019) Bertsch G F and Robledo L M 2019 Decay widths at the scission point in nuclear fission Phys. Rev. C 100, 044606.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.044606
• Bertsch et al. (2018) Bertsch G F, Younes W and Robledo L M 2018 Scission dynamics with $k$ partitions Phys. Rev. C 97, 064619.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.064619
• Bertsch, Younes and Robledo (2019) Bertsch G F, Younes W and Robledo L M 2019 Diabatic paths through the scission point in nuclear fission Phys. Rev. C 100, 024607.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.024607
• Bertsch and Younes (2019) Bertsch G and Younes W 2019 Composite-particle decay widths by the generator coordinate method Annals of Physics 403, 68 – 81.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003491619300144
• Bishop and Messina (2009) Bishop A and Messina P 2009 Scientific grand challenges for national security: The role of computing at the extreme scale Technical report U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C.
  https://science.osti.gov/-/media/ascr/pdf/program-documents/docs/Nnsa_grand_challenges_report.pdf
• Bjørnholm et al. (1973) Bjørnholm S, Bohr A and Mottelson B 1973 Role of symmetry on the nuclear shape in rotational contributions to nuclear level densities Proc. Third. IAEA Symp. on Physics and Chemistry of Fission 1, 367–372.
• Bjørnholm and Lynn (1980) Bjørnholm S and Lynn J E 1980 The double-humped fission barrier Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 725–931.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.52.725
• Blazkiewicz et al. (2005) Blazkiewicz A, Oberacker V E, Umar A S and Stoitsov M 2005 Coordinate space Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov calculations for the zirconium isotope chain up to the two-neutron drip line Phys. Rev. C 71, 054321.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.71.054321
• Blocki et al. (1978) Blocki J, Boneh Y, Nix J, Randrup J, Robel M, Sierk A and Swiatecki W 1978 One-body dissipation and the super-viscidity of nuclei Ann. Phys. (N-Y) 113(2), 330 – 386.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003491678902087
• Bonche et al. (1984) Bonche P, Levit S and Vautherin D 1984 Properties of highly excited nuclei Nucl. Phys. A 427(2), 278.
  https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(84)90086-1
• Bonneau et al. (2007) Bonneau L, Quentin P and Mikhailov I N 2007 Scission configurations and their implication in fission-fragment angular momenta Phys. Rev. C 75(6), 064313.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.75.064313
• Borunov et al. (2008) Borunov M, Nadtochy P and Adeev G 2008 Nuclear scission and fission-fragment kinetic-energy distribution: Study within three-dimensional Langevin dynamics Nuclear Physics A 799(1), 56 – 83.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947407007828
• Brack et al. (1972) Brack M, Damgaard J, Jensen A S, Pauli H C, Strutinsky V M and Wong C Y 1972 Funny Hills: The shell-correction approach to nuclear shell effects and its applications to the fission process Rev. Mod. Phys. 44, 320–405.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.44.320
• Brink et al. (1983) Brink D, Nemes M and Vautherin D 1983 Effect of intrinsic degrees of freedom on the quantum tunneling of a collective variable Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 147(1), 171 – 197.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003491683900702
• Brodziński et al. (2018) Brodziński W, Jachimowicz P, Kowal M and Skalski J 2018 Fission of SHN and Its Hindrance: Odd Nuclei and Isomers Acta Phys. Polon. B 49, 621–630.
  https://www.actaphys.uj.edu.pl/R/49/3/621
• Bulgac (2019) Bulgac A 2019 Projection of good quantum numbers for reaction fragments Phys. Rev. C 100, 034612.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.034612
• Bulgac et al. (2018) Bulgac A, Forbes M M, Jin S, Perez R N and Schunck N 2018 Minimal nuclear energy density functional Phys. Rev. C 97, 044313.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.044313
• Bulgac and Jin (2017) Bulgac A and Jin S 2017 Dynamics of fragmented condensates and macroscopic entanglement Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 052501.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.052501
• Bulgac, Jin, Roche, Schunck and Stetcu (2019) Bulgac A, Jin S, Roche K J, Schunck N and Stetcu I 2019 Fission dynamics of ${}^{240}\mathrm{Pu}$ from saddle to scission and beyond Phys. Rev. C 100, 034615.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.034615
• Bulgac, Jin and Stetcu (2019) Bulgac A, Jin S and Stetcu I 2019 Unitary evolution with fluctuations and dissipation Phys. Rev. C 100, 014615.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.014615
• Bulgac et al. (2020) Bulgac A, Jin S and Stetcu I 2020 Nuclear fission dynamics: Past, present, needs, and future Front. Phys. 8, 63.
  https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphy.2020.00063
• Bulgac et al. (2016) Bulgac A, Magierski P, Roche K J and Stetcu I 2016 Induced fission of ${}^{240}\mathrm{Pu}$ within a real-time microscopic framework Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 122504.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.122504
• Burke et al. (2005) Burke K, Werschnik J and Gross E K U 2005 Time-dependent density functional theory: Past, present, and future The Journal of Chemical Physics 123(6), 062206.
  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1904586
• Caldeira and Leggett (1983) Caldeira A and Leggett A 1983 Quantum tunnelling in a dissipative system Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 149(2), 374 – 456.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003491683902026
• Capote et al. (2009) Capote R, Herman M, Obložinský P, Young P G, Goriely S, Belgya T, Ignatyuk A V, Koning A J, Hilaire S, Plujko V A, Avrigeanu M, Bersillon O, Chadwick M B, Fukahori T, Ge Z, Han Y, Kailas S, Kopecky J, Maslov V M, Reffo G, Sin M, Soukhovitskii E S and Talou P 2009 RIPL – reference input parameter library for calculation of nuclear reactions and nuclear data evaluations Nucl. Data Sheets 110(12), 3107 – 3214. Special Issue on Nuclear Reaction Data.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090375209000994
• Carlson et al. (2016) Carlson J et al. 2016 Nuclear physics exascale requirements review Technical report U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C.
  https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1369223-nuclear-physics-exascale-requirements-review-office-science-review-sponsored-jointly-advanced-scientific-computing-research-nuclear-physics-june-gaithersburg-maryland
• Carlsson and Dobaczewski (2010) Carlsson B G and Dobaczewski J 2010 Convergence of density-matrix expansions for nuclear interactions Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 122501.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.122501
• Carlsson et al. (2008) Carlsson B G, Dobaczewski J and Kortelainen M 2008 Local nuclear energy density functional at next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order Phys. Rev. C 78, 044326.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.78.044326
• Cassing and Mosel (1990) Cassing W and Mosel U 1990 Many-body theory of high-energy heavy-ion reactions Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 25, 235 – 323.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014664109090032Y
• Chappert et al. (2015) Chappert F, Pillet N, Girod M and Berger J F 2015 Gogny force with a finite-range density dependence Phys. Rev. C 91, 034312.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.034312
• Cusson et al. (1985) Cusson R Y, Reinhard P G, Strayer M R, Maruhn J A and Greiner W 1985 Density as a constraint and the separation of internal excitation energy in TDHF Z. Phys. A 320, 475–482.
  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01415725
• Dagdeviren and Weidenmüller (1987) Dagdeviren N and Weidenmüller H 1987 Spontaneous fission and nuclear dissipation Physics Letters B 186(3), 267 – 271.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0370269387902929
• Davesne et al. (2018) Davesne D, Navarro J, Meyer J, Bennaceur K and Pastore A 2018 Two-body contributions to the effective mass in nuclear effective interactions Phys. Rev. C 97, 044304.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.044304
• Davesne et al. (2013) Davesne D, Pastore A and Navarro J 2013 Skyrme effective pseudopotential up to the next-to-next-to-leading order J. Phys. G 40(9), 095104.
  http://stacks.iop.org/0954-3899/40/i=9/a=095104
• Diebel et al. (1981) Diebel M, Albrecht K and Hasse R W 1981 Microscopic calculations of fission barriers and critical angular momenta for excited heavy nuclear systems Nucl. Phys. A 355(1), 66 – 92.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375947481901329
• Dietrich et al. (2010) Dietrich K, Niez J J and Berger J F 2010 Microscopic transport theory of nuclear processes Nuclear Physics A 832(3), 249 – 288.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947409008951
• Dobaczewski (2019) Dobaczewski J 2019 Density functional theory for nuclear fission - a proposal. arXiv:1910.03924.
  https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.03924
• Dobaczewski et al. (2012) Dobaczewski J, Bennaceur K and Raimondi F 2012 Effective theory for low-energy nuclear energy density functionals J. Phys. G 39, 125103.
  https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/39/12/125103
• Dobaczewski et al. (1984) Dobaczewski J, Flocard H and Treiner J 1984 Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov description of nuclei near the neutron-drip line Nucl. Phys. A 422(1), 103 – 139.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375947484904330
• Dobaczewski et al. (2014) Dobaczewski J, Nazarewicz W and Reinhard P G 2014 Error estimates of theoretical models: a guide J. Phys. G 41, 074001.
  https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/41/7/074001
• Dobaczewski et al. (1996) Dobaczewski J, Nazarewicz W, Werner T R, Berger J F, Chinn C R and Dechargé J 1996 Mean-field description of ground-state properties of drip-line nuclei: Pairing and continuum effects Phys. Rev. C 53, 2809–2840.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.53.2809
• Dobaczewski et al. (2009) Dobaczewski J, Satuła W, Carlsson B, Engel J, Olbratowski P, Powałowski P, Sadziak M, Sarich J, Schunck N, Staszczak A, Stoitsov M, Zalewski M and Zduńczuk H 2009 Solution of the Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov equations in the Cartesian deformed harmonic-oscillator basis.: (VI) hfodd (v2.40h): A new version of the program Comput. Phys. Commun. 180(11), 2361 – 2391.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010465509002598
• Dobaczewski and Skalski (1981) Dobaczewski J and Skalski J 1981 The quadrupole vibrational inertial function in the adiabatic time-dependent Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov approximation Nucl. Phys. A 369(1), 123 – 140.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375947481900105
• Dobaczewski et al. (2007) Dobaczewski J, Stoitsov M V, Nazarewicz W and Reinhard P G 2007 Particle-number projection and the density functional theory Phys. Rev. C 76, 054315.
  http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.76.054315
• Dönau et al. (1989) Dönau F, Zhang J and Riedinger L 1989 On the solution to the large amplitude collective motion of finite interacting Fermi systems Nucl. Phys. A 496(2), 333 – 345.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375947489901784
• Dubray et al. (2008) Dubray N, Goutte H and Delaroche J P 2008 Structure properties of ${}^{226}\mathrm{Th}$ and ${}^{256,258,260}\mathrm{Fm}$ fission fragments: Mean-field analysis with the Gogny force Phys. Rev. C 77, 014310.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.77.014310
• Dubray and Regnier (2012) Dubray N and Regnier D 2012 Numerical search of discontinuities in self-consistent potential energy surfaces Comput. Phys. Comm. 183(10), 2035.
  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2012.05.001
• Duguet et al. (2009) Duguet T, Bender M, Bennaceur K, Lacroix D and Lesinski T 2009 Particle-number restoration within the energy density functional formalism: Nonviability of terms depending on noninteger powers of the density matrices Phys. Rev. C 79, 044320.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.044320
• Dukelsky et al. (2019) Dukelsky J, García-Ramos J E, Arias J M, Pérez-Fernández P and Schuck P 2019 Number conserving particle-hole RPA for superfluid nuclei Phys. Lett. B 795, 537 – 541.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269319304484
• Dyhdalo et al. (2017) Dyhdalo A, Bogner S K and Furnstahl R J 2017 Applying the density matrix expansion with coordinate-space chiral interactions Phys. Rev. C 95, 054314.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.054314
• Egido et al. (2000) Egido J L, Robledo L M and Martin V 2000 Behavior of shell effects with the excitation energy in atomic nuclei Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 26–29.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.26
• Erler, Birge, Kortelainen, Nazarewicz, Olsen, Perhac and Stoitsov (2012) Erler J, Birge N, Kortelainen M, Nazarewicz W, Olsen E, Perhac A M and Stoitsov M 2012 The limits of the nuclear landscape Nature 486(7404), 509.
  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11188
• Erler, Langanke, Loens, Martínez-Pinedo and Reinhard (2012) Erler J, Langanke K, Loens H P, Martínez-Pinedo G and Reinhard P G 2012 Fission properties for $r$-process nuclei Phys. Rev. C 85, 025802.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.025802
• Eslamizadeh and Raanaei (2018) Eslamizadeh H and Raanaei H 2018 Dynamical study of fission process at low excitation energies in the framework of the four-dimensional Langevin equations Physics Letters B 783, 163 – 168.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269318305069
• Fong (1953) Fong P 1953 Asymmetric fission Phys. Rev. 89(1), 332–333.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.89.332
• Frégeau et al. (2012) Frégeau M O, Jacquet D, Morjean M, Bonnet E, Chbihi A, Frankland J D, Rivet M F, Tassan-Got L, Dechery F, Drouart A, Nalpas L, Ledoux X, Parlog M, Ciortea C, Dumitriu D, Fluerasu D, Gugiu M, Gramegna F, Kravchuk V L, Marchi T, Fabris D, Corsi A and Barlini S 2012 X-ray fluorescence from the element with atomic number $Z=120$ Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 122701.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.122701
• Gebremariam et al. (2011) Gebremariam B, Bogner S and Duguet T 2011 Microscopically-constrained Fock energy density functionals from chiral effective field theory. I. Two-nucleon interactions Nucl. Phys. A 851(1), 17 – 43.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947410007591
• Gebremariam et al. (2010) Gebremariam B, Duguet T and Bogner S K 2010 Improved density matrix expansion for spin-unsaturated nuclei Phys. Rev. C 82, 014305.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.014305
• Giannoni and Quentin (1980) Giannoni M J and Quentin P 1980 Mass parameters in the adiabatic time-dependent Hartree-Fock approximation. II. Results for the isoscalar quadrupole mode Phys. Rev. C 21, 2076–2093.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.21.2076
• Giuliani et al. (2018) Giuliani S A, Martínez-Pinedo G and Robledo L M 2018 Fission properties of superheavy nuclei for $r$-process calculations Phys. Rev. C 97, 034323.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.034323
• Giuliani et al. (2019) Giuliani S A, Martínez-Pinedo G, Wu M R and Robledo L M 2019 Fission and the r-process nucleosynthesis of translead nuclei. arXiv:1904.03733.
  http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.03733
• Giuliani and Robledo (2018) Giuliani S A and Robledo L M 2018 Non-perturbative collective inertias for fission: A comparative study Phys. Lett. B 787, 134–140.
  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.10.045
• Giuliani et al. (2014) Giuliani S A, Robledo L M and Rodríguez-Guzmán R 2014 Dynamic versus static fission paths with realistic interactions Phys. Rev. C 90, 054311.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.054311
• Godbey et al. (2020) Godbey K, Simenel C and Umar A S 2020 Microscopic predictions for the production of neutron-rich nuclei in the reaction ${}^{176}\mathrm{Yb}+{}^{176}\mathrm{Yb}$ Phys. Rev. C 101, 034602.
  https://link.aps.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.034602
• Godbey and Umar (2020) Godbey K and Umar A 2020 Quasifission dynamics in microscopic theories Front. Phys. 8, 40.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00040
• Godbey et al. (2019) Godbey K, Umar A S and Simenel C 2019 Deformed shell effects in ${}^{48}\mathrm{Ca}+{}^{249}\mathrm{Bk}$ quasifission fragments Phys. Rev. C 100, 024610.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.024610
• Goddard et al. (2016) Goddard P M, Stevenson P D and Rios A 2016 Fission dynamics within time–dependent Hartree–Fock. II. Boost-induced fission Phys. Rev. C 93, 014620.
  http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.014620
• Goddard et al. (2015) Goddard P, Stevenson P and Rios A 2015 Fission dynamics within time-dependent Hartree-Fock: Deformation-induced fission Phys. Rev. C 92, 054610.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.054610
• Goeke et al. (1983) Goeke K, Grümmer F and Reinhard P G 1983 Three-dimensional nuclear dynamics in the quantized ATDHF approach Ann. Phys (N.Y.) 150(2), 504 – 551.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003491683900258
• Goeke and Reinhard (1980) Goeke K and Reinhard P G 1980 The generator-coordinate-method with conjugate parameters and the unification of microscopic theories for large amplitude collective motion Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 124(2), 249.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003491680902109
• Goeke et al. (1981) Goeke K, Reinhard P G and Rowe D 1981 A study of collective paths in the time-dependent hartree-fock approach to large amplitude collective nuclear motion Nucl. Phys. A 359(2), 408.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375947481902463
• Gonzalez-Boquera et al. (2020) Gonzalez-Boquera C, Centelles M, Viñas X and Robledo L 2020 Comment on the paper Eur. Phys. J. A (2019) 55:150. arXiv:2004.01701.
  https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.01701
• Goriely et al. (2007) Goriely S, Samyn M and Pearson J 2007 Further explorations of Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov mass formulas. VII. Simultaneous fits to masses and fission barriers Phys. Rev. C 75(6), 064312.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.75.064312
• Goutte et al. (2005) Goutte H, Berger J F, Casoli P and Gogny D 2005 Microscopic approach of fission dynamics applied to fragment kinetic energy and mass distributions in ${}^{238}\mathrm{U}$ Phys. Rev. C 71, 024316.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.71.024316
• Goutte et al. (2004) Goutte H, Casoli P and Berger J F 2004 Mass and kinetic energy distributions of fission fragments using the time dependent generator coordinate method Nucl. Phys. A 734, 217.
  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0375947404000430
• Hashimoto (2013) Hashimoto Y 2013 Time-dependent Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov calculations using a Lagrange mesh with the Gogny interaction Phys. Rev. C 88, 034307.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.034307
• Hashimoto and Scamps (2016) Hashimoto Y and Scamps G 2016 Gauge angle dependence in time-dependent Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov calculations of ${}^{20}\mathrm{O}+{}^{20}\mathrm{O}$ head-on collisions with the Gogny interaction Phys. Rev. C 94, 014610.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.014610
• Higdon et al. (2015) Higdon D, McDonnell J D, Schunck N, Sarich J and Wild S M 2015 A Bayesian approach for parameter estimation and prediction using a computationally intensive model J. Phys. G 42(3), 034009.
  https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/42/3/034009
• Hilaire et al. (2012) Hilaire S, Girod M, Goriely S and Koning A 2012 Temperature-dependent combinatorial level densities with the D1M Gogny force Phys. Rev. C 86(6), 064317.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.86.064317
• Hill and Wheeler (1953) Hill D L and Wheeler J A 1953 Nuclear constitution and the interpretation of fission phenomena Phys. Rev. 89, 1102–1145.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.89.1102
• Hinde (1993) Hinde D 1993 Neutron emission as a clock and thermometer to probe the dynamics of fusion-fission and quasi-fission Nuclear Physics A 553, 255 – 270.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037594749390627A
• Hinohara (2015) Hinohara N 2015 Collective inertia of the Nambu-Goldstone mode from linear response theory Phys. Rev. C 92(3), 034321.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.034321
• Hinohara et al. (2007) Hinohara N, Nakatsukasa T, Matsuo M and Matsuyanagi K 2007 Gauge-Invariant Formulation of the Adiabatic Self-Consistent Collective Coordinate Method Progress of Theoretical Physics 117(3), 451–478.
  https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.117.451
• Hinohara et al. (2008) Hinohara N, Nakatsukasa T, Matsuo M and Matsuyanagi K 2008 Microscopic Derivation of Collective Hamiltonian by Means of the Adiabatic Self-Consistent Collective Coordinate Method: Shape Mixing in Low-Lying States of ${}^{68}$Se and ${}^{72}$Kr Progress of Theoretical Physics 119(1), 59–101.
  https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.119.59
• IdBetan and Nazarewicz (2012) IdBetan R and Nazarewicz W 2012 $\alpha$ decay in the complex-energy shell model Phys. Rev. C 86, 034338.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.86.034338
• Ignatyuk et al. (1980) Ignatyuk A, Mikhailov I, Molina L, Nazmitdinov R and Pomorsky K 1980 The shape of the heated fast-rotating nuclei Nucl. Phys. A 346(1), 191 – 215.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375947480904972
• Ishizuka et al. (2017) Ishizuka C, Usang M D, Ivanyuk F A, Maruhn J A, Nishio K and Chiba S 2017 Four-dimensional Langevin approach to low-energy nuclear fission of ${}^{236}$U Phys. Rev. C 96(6), 064616.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.064616
• Ivanyuk and Hofmann (1999) Ivanyuk F and Hofmann H 1999 Pairing and shell effects in the transport coefficients of collective motion Nuclear Physics A 657(1), 19 – 58.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947499003243
• Jacquet and Morjean (2009) Jacquet D and Morjean M 2009 Fission times of excited nuclei: An experimental overview Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 63(1), 155 – 185.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641008000756
• Jin et al. (2017) Jin S, Bulgac A, Roche K and Wlazłowski G 2017 Coordinate-space solver for superfluid many-fermion systems with the shifted conjugate-orthogonal conjugate-gradient method Phys. Rev. C 95, 044302.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.044302
• Jodon et al. (2016) Jodon R, Bender M, Bennaceur K and Meyer J 2016 Constraining the surface properties of effective Skyrme interactions Phys. Rev. C 94, 024335.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.024335
• Karpov et al. (2001) Karpov A V, Nadtochy P N, Vanin D V and Adeev G D 2001 Three-dimensional Langevin calculations of fission fragment mass-energy distribution from excited compound nuclei Phys. Rev. C 63, 054610.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.63.054610
• Kawano et al. (2015) Kawano T, Talou P and Weidenmüller H A 2015 Random-matrix approach to the statistical compound nuclear reaction at low energies using the monte carlo technique Phys. Rev. C 92, 044617.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.044617
• Kerman and Koonin (1976) Kerman A and Koonin S 1976 Hamiltonian formulation of time-dependent variational principles for the many-body system Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 100(1), 332 – 358.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003491676900658
• Kim et al. (1997) Kim K H, Otsuka T and Bonche P 1997 Three-dimensional TDHF calculations for reactions of unstable nuclei Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 23(10), 1267–1273.
  https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/23/10/014
• Kortelainen et al. (2010) Kortelainen M, Lesinski T, Moré J, Nazarewicz W, Sarich J, Schunck N, Stoitsov M V and Wild S 2010 Nuclear energy density optimization Phys. Rev. C 82, 024313.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.024313
• Kortelainen et al. (2014) Kortelainen M, McDonnell J, Nazarewicz W, Olsen E, Reinhard P G, Sarich J, Schunck N, Wild S M, Davesne D, Erler J and Pastore A 2014 Nuclear energy density optimization: Shell structure Phys. Rev. C 89, 054314.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.054314
• Kortelainen et al. (2012) Kortelainen M, McDonnell J, Nazarewicz W, Reinhard P G, Sarich J, Schunck N, Stoitsov M V and Wild S M 2012 Nuclear energy density optimization: Large deformations Phys. Rev. C 85, 024304.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.024304
• Krappe and Pomorski (2012) Krappe H J and Pomorski K 2012 Theory of Nuclear Fission Lecture Notes in Physics 838 Springer Verlag Heidelberg.
  https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-23515-3
• Kubo (1966) Kubo R 1966 The fluctuation-dissipation theorem Rep. Prog. Phys. 29(1), 255–284.
  https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/29/1/306
• Lackner et al. (2015) Lackner F, Březinová I, Sato T, Ishikawa K L and Burgdörfer J 2015 Propagating two-particle reduced density matrices without wave functions Phys. Rev. A 91, 023412.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.91.023412
• Lackner et al. (2017) Lackner F, Březinová I, Sato T, Ishikawa K L and Burgdörfer J 2017 High-harmonic spectra from time-dependent two-particle reduced-density-matrix theory Phys. Rev. A 95, 033414.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.033414
• Lacombe et al. (2016) Lacombe L, Suraud E, Reinhard P G and Dinh P 2016 Stochastic TDHF in an exactly solvable model Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 373, 216.
  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2016.07.008
• Lacroix (2006) Lacroix D 2006 Stochastic mean-field dynamics for fermions in the weak-coupling limit Phys. Rev. C 73, 044311.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.73.044311
• Lacroix and Ayik (2014) Lacroix D and Ayik S 2014 Stochastic quantum dynamics beyond mean field Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 95.
  https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2014-14095-8
• Lacroix et al. (2004) Lacroix D, Ayik S and Chomaz P 2004 Nuclear collective vibrations in extended mean-field theory Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 52(2), 497 – 563.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641004000146
• Lacroix et al. (1999) Lacroix D, Chomaz P and Ayik S 1999 On the simulation of extended TDHF theory Nucl. Phys. A 651(4), 369 – 378.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947499001360
• Lacroix et al. (2009) Lacroix D, Duguet T and Bender M 2009 Configuration mixing within the energy density functional formalism: Removing spurious contributions from nondiagonal energy kernels Phys. Rev. C 79, 044318.
  http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.044318
• Lasseri et al. (2020) Lasseri R D, Regnier D, Ebran J P and Penon A 2020 Taming nuclear complexity with a committee of multilayer neural networks Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 162502.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.162502
• Lechaftois et al. (2015) Lechaftois F, Deloncle I and Péru S 2015 Introduction of a valence space in quasiparticle random-phase approximation: Impact on vibrational mass parameters and spectroscopic properties Phys. Rev. C 92(3), 034315.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.034315
• Lemaître et al. (2018) Lemaître J F, Goriely S, Hilaire S and Dubray N 2018 Microscopic description of the fission path with the Gogny interaction Phys. Rev. C 98, 024623.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.024623
• Lemaître et al. (2019) Lemaître J F, Goriely S, Hilaire S and Sida J L 2019 Fully microscopic scission-point model to predict fission fragment observables Phys. Rev. C 99, 034612.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.034612
• Lemaître et al. (2015) Lemaître J F, Panebianco S, Sida J L, Hilaire S and Heinrich S 2015 New statistical scission-point model to predict fission fragment observables Phys. Rev. C 92(3), 034617.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.034617
• Levit et al. (1980) Levit S, Negele J W and Paltiel Z 1980 Barrier penetration and spontaneous fission in the time-dependent mean-field approximation Phys. Rev. C 22, 1979–1995.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.22.1979
• Łojewski and Staszczak (1999) Łojewski Z and Staszczak A 1999 Role of pairing degrees of freedom and higher multipolarity deformations in spontaneous fission process Nucl. Phys. A 657(2), 134 – 157.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947499003280
• Lu et al. (2014) Lu B N, Zhao J, Zhao E G and Zhou S G 2014 Multidimensionally-constrained relativistic mean-field models and potential-energy surfaces of actinide nuclei Phys. Rev. C 89, 014323.
  https://journals.aps.org/prc/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.014323
• Magierski et al. (2017) Magierski P, Sekizawa K and Wlazłowski G 2017 Novel role of superfluidity in low-energy nuclear reactions Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 042501.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.042501
• Mang (1975) Mang H 1975 The self-consistent single-particle model in nuclear physics Physics Reports 18(6), 325 – 368.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0370157375900125
• Martini et al. (2019) Martini M, Pace A D and Bennaceur K 2019 Spurious finite-size instabilities with Gogny-type interactions Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 150.
  https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12838-7
• Maruhn et al. (2014) Maruhn J A, Reinhard P G, Stevenson P D and Umar A S 2014 The TDHF code Sky3D Comput. Phys. Comm. 185(7), 2195.
  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2014.04.008
• Marumori et al. (1980) Marumori T, Maskawa T, Sakata F and Kuriyama A 1980 Self-Consistent Collective-Coordinate Method for the Large-Amplitude Nuclear Collective Motion Prog. Theor. Phys. 64(4), 1294–1314.
  https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.64.1294
• Matev and Slavov (1991) Matev M T and Slavov B 1991 Quasidynamic propagation in diabatic landscapes for low energy nuclear fission Z. Physik A 338(4), 431–434.
  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01295771
• Matheson et al. (2019) Matheson Z, Giuliani S A, Nazarewicz W, Sadhukhan J and Schunck N 2019 Cluster radioactivity of ${}^{294}$Og Phys. Rev. C 99(4), 041304.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.041304
• Matsuo et al. (2000) Matsuo M, Nakatsukasa T and Matsuyanagi K 2000 Adiabatic Selfconsistent Collective Coordinate Method for Large Amplitude Collective Motion in Nuclei with Pairing Correlations Prog. Theor. Phys. 103(5), 959–979.
  https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.103.959
• McDonnell et al. (2015) McDonnell J D, Schunck N, Higdon D, Sarich J, Wild S M and Nazarewicz W 2015 Uncertainty quantification for nuclear density functional theory and information content of new measurements Phys. Rev. Lett. 114(12), 122501.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.122501
• Metag et al. (1980) Metag V, Habs D and Specht H 1980 Spectroscopic properties of fission isomers Phys. Rep. 65(1), 1 – 41.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037015738090006X
• Mirea (2011) Mirea M 2011 Energy partition in low energy fission Phys. Rev. C 83, 054608.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.054608
• Mirea (2014) Mirea M 2014 Microscopic description of the odd-even effect in cold fission Phys. Rev. C 89, 034623.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.034623
• Mirea (2016) Mirea M 2016 Nuclear inertia from the time dependent pairing equations J. Phys. G 43(10), 105103.
  https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/43/10/105103
• Mirea (2019) Mirea M 2019 Cranking inertia of odd nuclei from time-dependent pairing equations: Application to Th cold fission Phys. Rev. C 100, 014607.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.014607
• Miyamoto et al. (2019) Miyamoto Y, Aritomo Y, Tanaka S, Hirose K and Nishio K 2019 Origin of the dramatic change of fission mode in fermium isotopes investigated using Langevin equations Phys. Rev. C 99, 051601.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.051601
• Möller and Ichikawa (2015) Möller P and Ichikawa T 2015 A method to calculate fission-fragment yields Y(Z,N) versus proton and neutron number in the Brownian shape-motion model Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 173.
  https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2015-15173-1
• Möller et al. (2001) Möller P, Madland D G, Sierk A J and Iwamoto A 2001 Nuclear fission modes and fragment mass asymmetries in a five-dimensional deformation space Nature 409, 785–790.
  https://doi.org/10.1038/35057204
• Möller et al. (2014) Möller P, Randrup J, Iwamoto A and Ichikawa T 2014 Fission-fragment charge yields: Variation of odd-even staggering with element number, energy, and charge asymmetry Phys. Rev. C 90, 014601.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.014601
• Möller and Schmitt (2017) Möller P and Schmitt C 2017 Evolution of uranium fission-fragment charge yields with neutron number Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 7.
  https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2017-12188-6
• Möller et al. (2009) Möller P, Sierk A J, Ichikawa T, Iwamoto A, Bengtsson R, Uhrenholt H and Åberg S 2009 Heavy-element fission barriers Phys. Rev. C 79, 064304.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.064304
• Moretto and Babinet (1974) Moretto L G and Babinet R P 1974 Large superfluidity enhancement in the penetration of the fission barrier Phys. Lett. B 49, 147.
  https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(74)90494-8
• Müller et al. (1984) Müller R, Naqvi A A, Käppeler F and Dickmann F 1984 Fragment velocities, energies, and masses from fast neutron induced fission of ${}^{235}$U Phys. Rev. C 29, 885.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.29.885
• Mumpower et al. (2018) Mumpower M R, Kawano T, Sprouse T M, Vassh N, Holmbeck E M, Surman R and Møller P 2018 $\beta$-delayed fission in r-process nucleosynthesis The Astrophysical Journal 869(1), 14.
  https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaeaca
• Mustonen and Engel (2016) Mustonen M T and Engel J 2016 Global description of $\beta$-decay in even-even nuclei with the axially-deformed Skyrme finite-amplitude method Phys. Rev. C 93, 014304.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.014304
• Mustonen et al. (2014) Mustonen M T, Shafer T, Zenginerler Z and Engel J 2014 Finite-amplitude method for charge-changing transitions in axially deformed nuclei Phys. Rev. C 90(2), 024308.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.024308
• Nadtochy et al. (2012) Nadtochy P N, Ryabov E G, Gegechkori A E, Anischenko Y A and Adeev G D 2012 Four-dimensional Langevin dynamics of heavy-ion-induced fission Phys. Rev. C 85, 064619.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.064619
• Nakatsukasa and Walet (1998) Nakatsukasa T and Walet N R 1998 Diabatic and adiabatic collective motion in a model pairing system Phys. Rev. C 57, 1192–1203.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.57.1192
• Naqvi et al. (1986) Naqvi A A, Käppeler F, Dickmann F and Müller R 1986 Fission fragment properties in fast-neutron-induced fission of ${}^{237}$Np Phys. Rev. C 34, 218–225.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.34.218
• Navarro Pérez et al. (2018) Navarro Pérez R, Schunck N, Dyhdalo A, Furnstahl R J and Bogner S K 2018 Microscopically based energy density functionals for nuclei using the density matrix expansion. II. Full optimization and validation Phys. Rev. C 97, 054304.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.054304
• Nazarewicz (1993) Nazarewicz W 1993 Diabaticity of nuclear motion: problems and perspectives Nucl. Phys. A 557, 489 – 514.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037594749390565F
• Nazarewicz (2001) Nazarewicz W 2001 in J. M Arias and M Lozano, eds, ‘An Advanced Course in Modern Nuclear Physics’ Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin, Heidelberg pp. 102–140.
  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44620-6_4
• Negele (1989) Negele J W 1989 Microscopic theory of fission dynamics Nucl. Phys. A 502, 371 – 386.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375947489906763
• Neufcourt et al. (2020) Neufcourt L, Cao Y, Giuliani S A, Nazarewicz W, Olsen E and Tarasov O B 2020 Quantified limits of the nuclear landscape Phys. Rev. C 101, 044307.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.044307
• Neufcourt et al. (2019) Neufcourt L, Cao Y, Nazarewicz W, Olsen E and Viens F 2019 Neutron dripline in the ca region from bayesian model averaging Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 062502.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.062502
• Neufcourt et al. (2018) Neufcourt L, Cao Y, Nazarewicz W and Viens F 2018 Bayesian approach to model-based extrapolation of nuclear observables Phys. Rev. C 98, 034318.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.034318
• Nikolov et al. (2011) Nikolov N, Schunck N, Nazarewicz W, Bender M and Pei J 2011 Surface symmetry energy of nuclear energy density functionals Phys. Rev. C 83(3), 034305.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.034305
• Nikšić et al. (2014) Nikšić T, Paar N, Vretenar D and Ring P 2014 DIRHB-A relativistic self-consistent mean-field framework for atomic nuclei Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1808–1821.
  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010465514000836
• Nikšić et al. (2015) Nikšić T, Paar N, Reinhard P G and Vretenar D 2015 Optimizing relativistic energy density functionals: covariance analysis J. Phys. G 42(3), 034008.
  http://stacks.iop.org/0954-3899/42/i=3/a=034008
• Nikšić et al. (2008) Nikšić T, Vretenar D and Ring P 2008 Relativistic nuclear energy density functionals: Adjusting parameters to binding energies Phys. Rev. C 78, 034318.
• Nix (1969) Nix J 1969 Further studies in the liquid-drop theory on nuclear fission Nucl. Phys. A 130(2), 241 – 292.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375947469907301
• Nörenberg (1983) Nörenberg W 1983 Dissipative diabatic dynamics Nucl. Phys. A 400, 275 – 292.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375947483904396
• Nörenberg (1984) Nörenberg W 1984 Elastoplasticity of finite fermi systems Nucl. Phys. A 428, 177 – 187.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375947484902501
• Oberacker et al. (2014) Oberacker V E, Umar A S and Simenel C 2014 Dissipative dynamics in quasifission Phys. Rev. C 90, 054605.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.054605
• Pal and Mukhopadhyay (1998) Pal S and Mukhopadhyay T 1998 Chaos modified wall formula damping of the surface motion of a cavity undergoing fissionlike shape evolutions Phys. Rev. C 57, 210–216.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.57.210
• Parrish et al. (2013) Parrish R M, Hohenstein E G, Schunck N F, Sherrill C D and Martínez T J 2013 Exact tensor hypercontraction: A universal technique for the resolution of matrix elements of local finite-range $N$-body potentials in many-body quantum problems Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 132505.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.132505
• Paşca et al. (2019) Paşca H, Andreev A V, Adamian G G and Antonenko N V 2019 Change of the shape of mass and charge distributions in fission of Cf isotopes with excitation energy Phys. Rev. C 99, 064611.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.064611
• Pastore et al. (2015) Pastore A, Davesne D and Navarro J 2015 Linear response of homogeneous nuclear matter with energy density functionals Phys. Rep. 563, 1 – 67.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370157314003998
• Pei et al. (2014) Pei J C, Fann G I, Harrison R J, Nazarewicz W, Shi Y and Thornton S 2014 Adaptive multi-resolution 3D Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov solver for nuclear structure Phys. Rev. C 90(2), 024317.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.024317
• Pei et al. (2009) Pei J C, Nazarewicz W, Sheikh J A and Kerman A K 2009 Fission barriers of compound superheavy nuclei Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 192501.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.192501
• Pei et al. (2008) Pei J, Stoitsov M, Fann G, Nazarewicz W, Schunck N and Xu F 2008 Deformed coordinate-space Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov approach to weakly bound nuclei and large deformations Phys. Rev. C 78(6), 064306.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.78.064306
• Perez et al. (2017) Perez R N, Schunck N, Lasseri R D, Zhang C and Sarich J 2017 Axially deformed solution of the Skyrme–Hartree–Fock–Bogolyubov equations using the transformed harmonic oscillator basis (iii) hfbtho (v3.00): A new version of the program Computer Physics Communications 220, 363 – 375.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010465517302047
• Peter et al. (1994) Peter A, Cassing W, Hauser J and Pfitzner A 1994 Microscopic analysis of two-body correlations in light nuclei Nucl. Phys. A 573(1), 93.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375947494900167
• Pillet and Hilaire (2017) Pillet N and Hilaire S 2017 Towards an extended gogny force Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 193.
  https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2017-12369-3
• Puddu and Negele (1987) Puddu G and Negele J W 1987 Solution of the mean field equations for spontaneous fission Phys. Rev. C 35, 1007–1027.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.35.1007
• Ramos et al. (2020) Ramos D et al. 2020 Scission configuration of ${}^{239}\mathrm{U}$ from yields and kinetic information of fission fragments Phys. Rev. C 101, 034609.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.034609
• Randrup and Möller (2011) Randrup J and Möller P 2011 Brownian shape motion on five-dimensional potential-energy surfaces: Nuclear fission-fragment mass distributions Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 132503.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.132503
• Randrup and Möller (2013) Randrup J and Möller P 2013 Energy dependence of fission-fragment mass distributions from strongly damped shape evolution Phys. Rev. C 88(6), 064606.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.064606
• Randrup et al. (2011) Randrup J, Möller P and Sierk A J 2011 Fission-fragment mass distributions from strongly damped shape evolution Phys. Rev. C 84, 034613.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.034613
• Randrup and Swiatecki (1984) Randrup J and Swiatecki W J 1984 Dissipative resistance against changes in the mass asymmetry degree of freedom in nuclear dynamics: The completed wall-and-window formula Nucl. Phys. A 429(1), 105.
  https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(84)90151-9
• Regnier et al. (2019) Regnier D, Dubray N and Schunck N 2019 From asymmetric to symmetric fission in the fermium isotopes within the time-dependent generator-coordinate-method formalism Phys. Rev. C 99, 024611.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.024611
• Regnier et al. (2016) Regnier D, Dubray N, Schunck N and Verrière M 2016 Fission fragment charge and mass distributions in ${}^{239}\mathrm{Pu}(n,f)$ in the adiabatic nuclear energy density functional theory Phys. Rev. C 93, 054611.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.054611
• Regnier and Lacroix (2019) Regnier D and Lacroix D 2019 Microscopic description of pair transfer between two superfluid Fermi systems. II. Quantum mixing of time-dependent Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov trajectories Phys. Rev. C 99, 064615.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.064615
• Reinhard (2018) Reinhard P G 2018 Nuclear density-functional theory and fission of super-heavy elements Eur. Phys. J A 54, 13.
  https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2018-12421-x
• Reinhard and Nazarewicz (2010) Reinhard P G and Nazarewicz W 2010 Information content of a new observable: The case of the nuclear neutron skin Phys. Rev. C 81, 051303.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.81.051303
• Reinhard et al. (2020) Reinhard P G, Schuetrumpf B and Maruhn J A 2020 The Axial Hartree-Fock + BCS Code SkyAx submitted to Comput. Phys. Commun. .
• Reinhard and Suraud (2015) Reinhard P G and Suraud E 2015 A quantum relaxation-time approximation for finite fermion systems Ann. of Phys. (N.Y.) 354, 183 – 202.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003491614003492
• Reinhard and Suraud (1992) Reinhard P G and Suraud S 1992 Stochastic TDHF and the Boltzman-Langevin equation Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 216, 98.
  https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(52)90043-2
• Reinhardt (1979) Reinhardt H 1979 Path-integral approach to time-dependent self-consistent field theories J. Phys. G 5, L91–L94.
• Ring and Schuck (1980) Ring P and Schuck P 1980 The nuclear many-body problem Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783540212065
• Robledo (2010a) Robledo L 2010a Gogny force HFB code with axial symmetry Technical report.
  http://gamma.ft.uam.es/robledo/Downloads.html
• Robledo (2009) Robledo L M 2009 Sign of the overlap of Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov wave functions Phys. Rev. C 79, 021302.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.021302
• Robledo (2010b) Robledo L M 2010b Remarks on the use of projected densities in the density-dependent part of Skyrme or Gogny functionals Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 37(6), 064020.
  http://stacks.iop.org/0954-3899/37/i=6/a=064020
• Robledo and Bertsch (2011) Robledo L M and Bertsch G F 2011 Application of the gradient method to Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov theory Phys. Rev. C 84, 014312.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.014312
• Robledo et al. (2018) Robledo L M, Rodríguez T R and Rodríguez-Guzmán R R 2018 Mean field and beyond description of nuclear structure with the Gogny force: a review J. Phys. G 46(1), 013001.
  https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/aadebd
• Rodríguez-Guzmán et al. (2020) Rodríguez-Guzmán R, Humadi Y M and Robledo L M 2020 Microscopic description of fission in superheavy nuclei with the parametrization D1M${}^{*}$ of the Gogny energy density functional Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 43.
  https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00051-w
• Rodriguez-Guzmán and Robledo (2017) Rodriguez-Guzmán R and Robledo L 2017 Microscopic description of fission in odd-mass uranium and plutonium nuclei with the Gogny energy density functional Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 245.
  http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2017-12444-9
• Rohoziński et al. (2010) Rohoziński S G, Dobaczewski J and Nazarewicz W 2010 Self-consistent symmetries in the proton-neutron Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov approach Phys. Rev. C 81, 014313.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.81.014313
• Ryssens (2016) Ryssens W 2016 Symmetry breaking in nuclear mean-field models PhD thesis Université Libre de Bruxelles.
• Ryssens et al. (2019) Ryssens W, Bender M and Heenen P H 2019 Iterative approaches to the self-consistent nuclear energy density functional problem. Heavy ball dynamics and potential preconditioning Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 93.
  https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12766-6
• Ryssens, Heenen and Bender (2015) Ryssens W, Heenen P H and Bender M 2015 Numerical accuracy of mean-field calculations in coordinate space Phys. Rev. C 92, 064318.
  http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.064318
• Ryssens, Hellemans, Bender and Heenen (2015) Ryssens W, Hellemans V, Bender M and Heenen P H 2015 Solution of the Skyrme–HF+BCS equation on a 3D mesh, II: A new version of the Ev8 code Comput. Phys. Comm. 187, 175.
  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2014.10.001
• Sadhukhan et al. (2014) Sadhukhan J, Dobaczewski J, Nazarewicz W, Sheikh J A and Baran A 2014 Pairing-induced speedup of nuclear spontaneous fission Phys. Rev. C 90, 061304.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.061304
• Sadhukhan et al. (2016) Sadhukhan J, Nazarewicz W and Schunck N 2016 Microscopic modeling of mass and charge distributions in the spontaneous fission of ${}^{240}\mathrm{Pu}$ Phys. Rev. C 93, 011304.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.011304
• Sadhukhan et al. (2017) Sadhukhan J, Zhang C, Nazarewicz W and Schunck N 2017 Formation and distribution of fragments in the spontaneous fission of ${}^{240}$Pu Phys. Rev. C 96, 061301.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.061301
• Sadoudi et al. (2013) Sadoudi J, Duguet T, Meyer J and Bender M 2013 Skyrme functional from a three-body pseudopotential of second order in gradients: Formalism for central terms Phys. Rev. C 88(6), 064326.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.064326
• Samyn et al. (2005) Samyn M, Goriely S and Pearson J 2005 Further explorations of Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov mass formulas. V. Extension to fission barriers Phys. Rev. C 72(4), 044316.
• Scamps and Hagino (2015) Scamps G and Hagino K 2015 Multidimensional fission model with a complex absorbing potential Phys. Rev. C 91, 044606.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.044606
• Scamps and Hashimoto (2017) Scamps G and Hashimoto Y 2017 Transfer probabilities for the reactions ${}^{14,20}$O+${}^{20}$O in terms of multiple time-dependent Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov trajectories Phys. Rev. C 96, 031602.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.031602
• Scamps and Lacroix (2013) Scamps G and Lacroix D 2013 Effect of pairing on one- and two-nucleon transfer below the coulomb barrier: A time-dependent microscopic description Phys. Rev. C 87, 014605.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.014605
• Scamps and Simenel (2018) Scamps G and Simenel C 2018 Impact of pear-shaped fission fragments on mass-asymmetric fission in actinides Nature 564(7736), 382–385.
  http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0780-0
• Scamps and Simenel (2019) Scamps G and Simenel C 2019 Effect of shell structure on the fission of sub–lead nuclei Phys. Rev. C 100, 041602.
  http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.041602
• Scamps et al. (2015) Scamps G, Simenel C and Lacroix D 2015 Superfluid dynamics of ${}^{258}\mathrm{Fm}$ fission Phys. Rev. C 92, 011602.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.011602
• Schmidt and Jurado (2018) Schmidt K H and Jurado B 2018 Review on the progress in nuclear fission: experimental methods and theoretical descriptions Rep. Prog. Phys. 81(10), 106301.
  https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aacfa7
• Schuetrumpf et al. (2016) Schuetrumpf B, Nazarewicz W and Reinhard P G 2016 Time-dependent density functional theory with twist-averaged boundary conditions Phys. Rev. C 93, 054304.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.054304
• Schuetrumpf et al. (2018) Schuetrumpf B, Reinhard P G, Stevenson P, Umar A and Maruhn J 2018 The TDHF code Sky3D version 1.1 Computer Physics Communications 229, 211 – 213.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010465518300845
• Schunck (2019) Schunck N 2019 Energy density functional methods for atomic nuclei IOP Expanding Physics IOP Publishing Bristol, UK. OCLC: 1034572493.
  http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2053-2563/aae0ed
• Schunck et al. (2017) Schunck N, Dobaczewski J, Satuła W, Ba̧czyk P, Dudek J, Gao Y, Konieczka M, Sato K, Shi Y, Wang X and Werner T 2017 Solution of the Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov equations in the Cartesian deformed harmonic-oscillator basis. (VIII) hfodd (v2.73y): A new version of the program Comput. Phys. Commun. 216, 145 – 174.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010465517300942
• Schunck, Duke and Carr (2015) Schunck N, Duke D and Carr H 2015 Description of induced nuclear fission with Skyrme energy functionals. II. Finite temperature effects Phys. Rev. C 91, 034327.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.034327
• Schunck et al. (2014) Schunck N, Duke D, Carr H and Knoll A 2014 Description of induced nuclear fission with skyrme energy functionals: Static potential energy surfaces and fission fragment properties Phys. Rev. C 90, 054305.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.054305
• Schunck, McDonnell, Higdon, Sarich and Wild (2015) Schunck N, McDonnell J D, Higdon D, Sarich J and Wild S M 2015 Uncertainty quantification and propagation in nuclear density functional theory Eur. Phys. J. A 51(12), 1.
  https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2015-15169-9
• Schunck, McDonnell, Sarich, Wild and Higdon (2015) Schunck N, McDonnell J D, Sarich J, Wild S M and Higdon D 2015 Error analysis in nuclear density functional theory J. Phys. G 42(3), 034024.
  https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/42/3/034024
• Schunck and Robledo (2016) Schunck N and Robledo L M 2016 Microscopic theory of nuclear fission: a review Reports on Progress in Physics 79(11), 116301.
  https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/79/11/116301
• Schütte and Wilets (1975a) Schütte G and Wilets L 1975a Constrained Hartree-Bogoliubov solutions as a basis for time-dependent calculations Phys. Rev. C 12, 2100–2102.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.12.2100
• Schütte and Wilets (1975b) Schütte G and Wilets L 1975b Dynamics and non-adiabaticity in the fission process Nucl. Phys. A 252(1), 21 – 41.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375947475905989
• Schütte and Wilets (1978) Schütte G and Wilets L 1978 Excitation during collective deformation: How simple it is Z. Physik A 286(3), 313–318.
  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01408263
• Sekizawa (2019) Sekizawa K 2019 TDHF theory and its extensions for them multinucleon transfer reaction: A mini review Front. Phys. 7, 20.
  https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2019.00020/full
• Sekizawa and Yabana (2016) Sekizawa K and Yabana K 2016 Time-dependent Hartree-Fock calculations for multinucleon transfer and quasifission processes in the ${}^{64}\mathrm{Ni}+{}^{238}\mathrm{U}$ reaction Phys. Rev. C 93, 054616.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.054616
• Shafer et al. (2016) Shafer T, Engel J, Fröhlich C, McLaughlin G C, Mumpower M and Surman R 2016 $\beta$ decay of deformed $r$-process nuclei near $A=80$ and $A=160$, including odd-$A$ and odd-odd nuclei, with the Skyrme finite-amplitude method Phys. Rev. C 94, 055802.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.055802
• Sheikh et al. (2009) Sheikh J A, Nazarewicz W and Pei J C 2009 Systematic study of fission barriers of excited superheavy nuclei Phys. Rev. C 80, 011302.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.80.011302
• Sheikh et al. (2019) Sheikh J, Dobaczewski J, Ring P, Robledo L and Yannouleas C 2019 Symmetry restoration in mean-field approaches. arxiv:1901.06992.
  https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.06992
• Sierk (2017) Sierk A J 2017 Langevin model of low-energy fission Phys. Rev. C 96(3), 034603.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.034603
• Sierk and Nix (1980) Sierk A J and Nix J R 1980 Fission in a wall-and-window one-body-dissipation model Phys. Rev. C 21(3), 982.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.21.982
• Sikdar et al. (2018) Sikdar A K, Ray A, Pandit D, Dey B, Bhattacharyya S, Bhattacharya S, Bisoi A, De A, Paul S, Bhattacharya S and Chatterjee A 2018 Slow fission of highly excited plutonium nuclei Phys. Rev. C 98, 024615.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.024615
• Simenel (2010) Simenel C 2010 Particle transfer reactions with the Time-Dependent Hartree-Fock theory using a particle number projection technique Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 192701.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.192701
• Simenel (2011) Simenel C 2011 Particle-number fluctuations and correlations in transfer reactions obtained using the Balian-Vénéroni variational principle Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 112502.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.112502
• Simenel (2012) Simenel C 2012 Nuclear quantum many-body dynamics Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 152.
  http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2012-12152-0
• Simenel and Umar (2018) Simenel C and Umar A 2018 Heavy-ion collisions and fission dynamics with the time-dependent Hartree-Fock theory and its extensions Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 103, 19 – 66.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641018300693
• Simenel and Umar (2014) Simenel C and Umar A S 2014 Formation and dynamics of fission fragments Phys. Rev. C 89, 031601(R).
  http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.031601
• Singh et al. (2002) Singh B, Zywina R and Firestone R B 2002 Table of superdeformed nuclear bands and fission isomers: (october 2002) Nucl. Data Sheets 97(2), 241.
  https://doi.org/10.1006/ndsh.2002.0018
• Skalski (2006) Skalski J 2006 Relative kinetic energy correction to self-consistent fission barriers Phys. Rev. C 74, 051601.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.74.051601
• Skalski (2008) Skalski J 2008 Nuclear fission with mean-field instantons Phys. Rev. C 77, 064610.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.77.064610
• Slama et al. (2015) Slama N, Reinhard P G and Suraud S 2015 On the inclusion of collisional correlations in quantum dynamics Ann. Phys. (N. Y.) 355, 182.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003491615000433
• Smirenkin (1993) Smirenkin G N 1993 IAEA-Report INDC(CCP)-359 Technical report IAEA, Vienna.
  https://www-nds.iaea.org/RIPL-3/
• Staszczak et al. (1989) Staszczak A, Piłat S and Pomorski K 1989 Influence of the pairing vibrations on spontaneous fission probability Nucl. Phys. A 504(3), 589 – 604.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375947489905599
• Stoitsov et al. (2010) Stoitsov M, Kortelainen M, Bogner S K, Duguet T, Furnstahl R J, Gebremariam B and Schunck N 2010 Microscopically based energy density functionals for nuclei using the density matrix expansion: Implementation and pre-optimization Phys. Rev. C 82, 054307.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.054307
• Stoitsov et al. (2007) Stoitsov M V, Dobaczewski J, Kirchner R, Nazarewicz W and Terasaki J 2007 Variation after particle-number projection for the Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov method with the Skyrme energy density functional Phys. Rev. C 76, 014308.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.76.014308
• Stoitsov et al. (2003) Stoitsov M V, Dobaczewski J, Nazarewicz W, Pittel S and Dean D J 2003 Systematic study of deformed nuclei at the drip lines and beyond Phys. Rev. C 68(5), 054312.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.68.054312
• Strutinsky (1977) Strutinsky V M 1977 Collective motion at large amplitudes and finite velocities Z. Physik 280(1), 99–106.
  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01438114
• Talou et al. (2018) Talou P, Vogt R, Randrup J, Rising M E, Pozzi S A, Verbeke J, Andrews M T, Clarke S D, Jaffke P, Jandel M, Kawano T, Marcath M J, Meierbachtol K, Nakae L, Rusev G, Sood A, Stetcu I and Walker C 2018 Correlated prompt fission data in transport simulations Eur. Phys. J. A 54(1), 9.
  https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2018-12455-0
• Tanimura et al. (2017) Tanimura Y, Lacroix D and Ayik S 2017 Microscopic phase–space exploration modeling of ${}^{258}\mathrm{Fm}$ spontaneous fission Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 152501.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.152501
• Tanimura et al. (2015) Tanimura Y, Lacroix D and Scamps G 2015 Collective aspects deduced from time-dependent microscopic mean-field with pairing: Application to the fission process Phys. Rev. C 92, 034601.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.034601
• Tao et al. (2017) Tao H, Zhao J, Li Z P, Nikšić T and Vretenar D 2017 Microscopic study of induced fission dynamics of ${}^{226}$Th with covariant energy density functionals Phys. Rev. C 96, 024319.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.024319
• Terán et al. (2003) Terán E, Oberacker V E and Umar A S 2003 Axially symmetric Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov calculations for nuclei near the drip lines Phys. Rev. C 67, 064314.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.67.064314
• Thirolf and Habs (2002) Thirolf P G and Habs D 2002 Spectroscopy in the second and third minimum of actinide nuclei Prog. in Part. Nucl. Phys. 49(2), 325 – 402.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641002001588
• Tohyama and Umar (2002) Tohyama M and Umar A S 2002 Fusion window problem in time-dependent Hartree-Fock theory revisited Phys. Rev. C 65, 037601.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.65.037601
• Tully (2012) Tully J C 2012 Perspective: Nonadiabatic dynamics theory J. Chem. Phys. 137(22), 22A301.
  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4757762
• Uhrenholt et al. (2013) Uhrenholt H, Åberg S, Dobrowolski A, Døssing T, Ichikawa T and Möller P 2013 Combinatorial nuclear level-density model Nucl. Phys. A 913, 127.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947413005976
• Umar and Oberacker (2005) Umar A S and Oberacker V E 2005 Time-dependent response calculations of nuclear resonances Phys. Rev. C 71, 034314.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.71.034314
• Umar and Oberacker (2006) Umar A S and Oberacker V E 2006 Heavy-ion interaction potential deduced from density-constrained time-dependent Hartree-Fock calculation Phys. Rev. C 74, 021601.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.74.021601
• Umar et al. (2016) Umar A S, Oberacker V E and Simenel C 2016 Fusion and quasifission dynamics in the reactions ${}^{48}\mathrm{𝐂𝐚}+{}^{249}\mathrm{𝐁𝐤}$ and ${}^{50}\mathrm{𝐓𝐢}+{}^{249}\mathrm{𝐁𝐤}$ using a time-dependent Hartree-Fock approach Phys. Rev. C 94, 024605.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.024605
• Umar et al. (1985) Umar A S, Strayer M R, Cusson R Y, Reinhard P G and Bromley D A 1985 Time-dependent Hartree-Fock calculations of ${}^4$He+${}^{14}$C, ${}^{12}$C+${}^{12}$C$(0^{+}$), and ${}^4$He${+}^{20}$Ne molecular formations Phys. Rev. C 32, 172–183.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.32.172
• Urin and Zaretsky (1966) Urin M and Zaretsky D 1966 On the spontaneous fission of nuclei Nucl. Phys. 75(1), 101 – 108.
  http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0029558266907498
• Usang et al. (2016) Usang M D, Ivanyuk F A, Ishizuka C and Chiba S 2016 Effects of microscopic transport coefficients on fission observables calculated by the Langevin equation Phys. Rev. C 94, 044602.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.044602
• Usang et al. (2017) Usang M D, Ivanyuk F A, Ishizuka C and Chiba S 2017 Analysis of the total kinetic energy of fission fragments with the Langevin equation Phys. Rev. C 96, 064617.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.064617
• Usang et al. (2019) Usang M, Ivanyuk F, Ishizuka C and Chiba S 2019 Correlated transitions in TKE and mass distributions of fission fragments described by 4-D Langevin equation Sci. Rep. 9(24), 1525.
  https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-37993-7
• Vaquero et al. (2013) Vaquero N L, Egido J L and Rodríguez T R 2013 Large-amplitude pairing fluctuations in atomic nuclei Phys. Rev. C 88, 064311.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.064311
• Vaquero et al. (2011) Vaquero N L, Rodríguez T R and Egido J L 2011 On the impact of large amplitude pairing fluctuations on nuclear spectra Phys. Lett. B 704, 520 – 526.
  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2011.09.073
• Verriere and Regnier (2020) Verriere M and Regnier D 2020 The time-dependent generator coordinate method in nuclear physics Front. Phys. 8, 233.
  https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2020.00233
• Verriere et al. (2019) Verriere M, Schunck N and Kawano T 2019 Number of particles in fission fragments Phys. Rev. C 100, 024612.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.024612
• Wada et al. (1993) Wada T, Abe Y and Carjan N 1993 One-body dissipation in agreement with prescission neutrons and fragment kinetic energies Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3538–3541.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3538
• Wakhle et al. (2014) Wakhle A, Simenel C, Hinde D J, Dasgupta M, Evers M, Luong D H, du Rietz R and Williams E 2014 Interplay between Quantum Shells and Orientation in Quasifission Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 182502.
  http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.182502
• Ward et al. (2017) Ward D E, Carlsson B G, Døssing T, Möller P, Randrup J and Åberg S 2017 Nuclear shape evolution based on microscopic level densities Phys. Rev. C 95, 024618.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.024618
• Warda et al. (2002) Warda M, Egido J L, Robledo L M and Pomorski K 2002 Self-consistent calculations of fission barriers in the Fm region Phys. Rev. C 66, 014310.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.66.014310
• Washiyama and Lacroix (2008) Washiyama K and Lacroix D 2008 Energy dependence of the nucleus-nucleus potential close to the coulomb barrier Phys. Rev. C 78, 024610.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.78.024610
• Washiyama et al. (2009) Washiyama K, Lacroix D and Ayik S 2009 One-body energy dissipation in fusion reactions from mean-field theory Phys. Rev. C 79, 024609.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.024609
• Wen et al. (2018) Wen K, Barton M C, Rios A and Stevenson P D 2018 Two-body dissipation effect in nuclear fusion reactions Phys. Rev. C 98, 014603.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.014603
• Wen and Nakatsukasa (2017) Wen K and Nakatsukasa T 2017 Adiabatic self-consistent collective path in nuclear fusion reactions Phys. Rev. C 96, 014610.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.014610
• Wen and Nakatsukasa (2020) Wen K and Nakatsukasa T 2020 Collective inertial masses in nuclear reactions Front. Phys. 8, 16.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00016
• Wilhelmy et al. (1972) Wilhelmy J B, Cheifetz E, Jared R C, Thompson S G, Bowman H R and Rasmussen J O 1972 Angular momentum of primary products formed in the spontaneous fission of ${}^{252}\mathrm{Cf}$ Phys. Rev. C 5, 2041–2060.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.5.2041
• Wilkins et al. (1976) Wilkins B D, Steinberg E P and Chasman R R 1976 Scission-point model of nuclear fission based on deformed-shell effects Phys. Rev. C 14(5), 1832–1863.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.14.1832
• Williams et al. (2018) Williams E, Sekizawa K, Hinde D J, Simenel C, Dasgupta M, Carter I P, Cook K J, Jeung D Y, McNeil S D, Palshetkar C S, Rafferty D C, Ramachandran K and Wakhle A 2018 Exploring zeptosecond quantum equilibration dynamics: From deep-inelastic to fusion-fission outcomes in ${}^{58}$Ni+${}^{60}Ni$ reactions Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 022501.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.022501
• Wittig (2005) Wittig C 2005 The Landau–Zener formula J. Phys. Chem. B 109(17), 8428–8430.
  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp040627u
• Wong and Tang (1978) Wong C Y and Tang H H K 1978 Extended Time-Dependent Hartree-Fock Approximation with particle collisions Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 1070–1073.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.1070
• Wong and Tang (1979) Wong C Y and Tang H H K 1979 Dynamics of nuclear fluid. V. Extended time-dependent Hartree-Fock approximation illuminates the approach to thermal equilibrium Phys. Rev. C 20, 1419–1452.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.20.1419
• Yamada and Ikeda (2012) Yamada H S and Ikeda K S 2012 Time-reversal characteristics of quantum normal diffusion Eur. Phys. J. B 85(1), 41.
  https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2011-20811-8
• Younes and Gogny (2011) Younes W and Gogny D 2011 Nuclear scission and quantum localization Phys. Rev. Lett. 107(13), 132501.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.132501
• Younes et al. (2019) Younes W, Gogny D M and Berger J F 2019 A Microscopic Theory of Fission Dynamics Based on the Generator Coordinate Method Lecture Notes in Physics 950 Springer Verlag Heidelberg.
  https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-04424-4
• Young et al. (2009) Young G, Dean D and Savage M 2009 Scientific grand challenges: forefront questions in nuclear science and the role of computing at the extreme scale Technical report U.S. Department of Energy Washington, D.C.
  https://science.osti.gov/-/media/ascr/pdf/program-documents/docs/Np_report.pdf
• Zdeb et al. (2017) Zdeb A, Dobrowolski A and Warda M 2017 Fission dynamics of ${}^{252}$Cf Phys. Rev. C 95, 054608.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.054608
• Zhang et al. (2018) Zhang Y N, Bogner S K and Furnstahl R J 2018 Incorporating brueckner-hartree-fock correlations in energy density functionals Phys. Rev. C 98, 064306.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.064306
• Zhao et al. (2016) Zhao J, Lu B N, Nikšić T, Vretenar D and Zhou S G 2016 Multidimensionally-constrained relativistic mean-field study of spontaneous fission: Coupling between shape and pairing degrees of freedom Phys. Rev. C 93, 044315.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.044315
• Zhao et al. (2019) Zhao J, Xiang J, Li Z P, Nikšić T, Vretenar D and Zhou S G 2019 Time-dependent generator-coordinate-method study of mass-asymmetric fission of actinides Phys. Rev. C 99, 054613.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.054613
• Zhao et al. (2010) Zhao P W, Li Z P, Yao J M and Meng J 2010 New parametrization for the nuclear covariant energy density functional with a point-coupling interaction Phys. Rev. C 82, 054319.
  https://journals.aps.org/prc/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.054319
• Zhu and Pei (2014) Zhu Y and Pei J C 2014 Microscopic description of neutron emission rates in compound nuclei Phys. Rev. C 90, 054316.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.054316
• Zhu and Pei (2016) Zhu Y and Pei J C 2016 Thermal fission rates with temperature dependent fission barriers Phys. Rev. C 94, 024329.
  https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.024329