next up previous
Next: The Model Up: QUADRUPOLE INERTIA, ZERO-POINT CORRECTIONS, Previous: QUADRUPOLE INERTIA, ZERO-POINT CORRECTIONS,

Introduction

The microscopic description of the fission process is one of the most challenging issues in nuclear structure. It represents an extreme example of the tunneling of the many-body system. There exist many descriptions of spontaneous fission based on the adiabatic assumption. While the microscopic-macroscopic models still offer the best fit to the data, during recent years, a number of self-consistent approaches rooted in the Adiabatic Time-Dependent Hartree-Fock method (such as the collective Schrödinger equation with microscopic mass tensor) have been introduced.

The spontaneous-fission half-life can be reliably estimated within the semi-classical WKB approximation. Here, the key quantity is the action integral

\begin{displaymath}
S=\int_{(s)} \left\{2\left[V(q)-E\right]\sum_{ij}B_{ij}(q)
q_i^\prime q_j^\prime\right\}^{1/2}\,ds
\end{displaymath} (1)

along the trajectory $s$ in the multidimensional space of collective parameters $\{q\}$. In Eq. (1), $V({q})$ represents the collective potential given by the HF+BCS or HFB energy, $E$ is the ground-state energy, $B(q)$ is a second rank tensor of a collective mass, and the prime denotes a derivative with respect to $s$.

The total energy of the system as a function of collective coordinates represents a zero-order approximation to the potential energy surface for shape-vibrations, ${V}(q)$. However, before one can use ${V}(q)$ in calculations with the collective Hamiltonian, dynamic corrections have to be added. The reason is that the underlying states have a finite uncertainty in the collective deformation. As a consequence, the potential ${V}(q)$ contains contributions from quantum fluctuations, and these contributions need to be subtracted first before adding the energies associated with the true physical zero-point fluctuations, $E_0$, see Ref.[1]. The theoretical evaluation of these correction terms can be done in the framework of the cranking approximation (CRA), the generator coordinate method (GCM)[2], or the Gaussian overlap approximation to GCM (GOA)[3,4,5,6,7].

Having minimized the action $S$ in the collective space $\{q\}$, the spontaneous-fission half-life $T_{\rm sf}$ can be calculated from[8]

\begin{displaymath}
\log{T_{\rm sf}} = -20.54 +\log{[1+\exp{(2S_{\rm min})}]} - \log{(2E_0)}.
\end{displaymath} (2)

It immediately follows from Eq. (1) that both the potential $V(q)$ and the inertia tensor $B(q)$ determine the fission dynamics in the multidimensional collective space; hence the value of $T_{\rm sf}$.

In this work we discuss fission barriers, mass parameters, and zero-point energy (ZPE) corrections calculated in the Hartree-Fock+BCS model with the commonly used Skyrme SkM$^*$ and SLy4 energy density functionals. The Skyrme results are compared to those within the Gogny D1S Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov model[9,7]. Another comparison is done between collective inertia obtained in the GOA and CRA approximations.


next up previous
Next: The Model Up: QUADRUPOLE INERTIA, ZERO-POINT CORRECTIONS, Previous: QUADRUPOLE INERTIA, ZERO-POINT CORRECTIONS,
Jacek Dobaczewski 2006-10-30