next up previous
Next: Neutron-drip-line calculations Up: Results Previous: Tests of the method

Drip-line-to-drip-line calculations in Mg

 

The chain of even-Z magnesium isotopes has been the subject of numerous recent theoretical analyses. The extreme interest in this isotopic chain is motivated by recent measurements in 32Mg [48,49,50], which show a larger-then-expected quadrupole collectivity. Based on the relativistic and non-relativistic mean-field approaches and on shell-model calculations (see Ref. [51] for a review), it is now well documented that shape coexistence and configuration mixing occur in this N=20 nucleus. Moreover, recent advances in radioactive-ion-beam technology allow mass measurements of even heavier isotopes [52], giving hope that the neutron-drip line can be experimentally reached in the Z=12 chain [53].

In this section, we present results of an investigation of the deformation properties of the even-even Mg isotopes from the proton-drip-line to the neutron-drip-line. Our results are complementary to those of recent Skyrme+HFB calculations [8], in which the imaginary-time evolution method of finding eigenstates of the mean-field Hamiltonian h (see Sec. 4) was combined with a diagonalization of the HFB Hamiltonian within a relatively small set of these eigenstates. In that study, a complete set of results was given only for the SIII force and density-dependent pairing was used. Here, we present a complete set of results for the SLy4 force with a density-independent (volume) pairing interaction. These calculations were carried out with $N_{{\rm\scriptsize {sh}}}$=20 and $N^{{\rm\scriptsize {par}}}_{{\rm\scriptsize {sh}}}$=12 HO shells.

In Fig. 5, we plot the total HFB energies per nucleon E/A, the neutron chemical potentials $\lambda_{n}$, the neutron and proton deformation parameters, $\beta_{n}$ and $\beta_{p}$, the neutron, proton, and total quadrupole moments, Qn, Qp, and Qt, the average neutron and proton pairing gaps, $\widetilde{\Delta}_{n}$ and $\widetilde{\Delta}_{p}$, Eq. (53), and the pairing energies $E_{{\rm\scriptsize {pair}}}^{n}$ and $E_{{\rm\scriptsize {pair}}}^{p}$ for the magnesium isotopes as functions of the mass number A. Ground-state values are shown by full symbols connected by lines, while the isolated open symbols correspond to secondary minima of the deformation-energy curves. In the top panel of Fig. 6, we compare the results for the two-neutron separation energies S2n (open symbols) with those for the related quantity $-2\lambda_{n}$ (full symbols), and in the bottom panel we show the neutron and proton rms radii.

The lightest Mg isotope predicted by these calculations to be bound against two-proton decay is 20Mg. The heaviest bound against two-neutron decay, on the basis of having a positive two-neutron separation energy, is 40Mg. On this basis, the position of the two-neutron drip line obtained within the HFB+SLy4 approach is identical to that obtained in the finite-range droplet model [54], relativistic mean field (RMF) [55], and HFB+SIII [8] calculations. The RMF approach with the NL-SH effective interaction [56] predicts the two-neutron drip line at 42Mg, and the relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov (HB) approach with the NL3 effective interaction [57] predicts it at or beyond 44Mg.

On the other hand, from Fig. 6, we see that both 42Mg and 44Mg, though having negative values of S2n, have (small) negative values of the Fermi energy, $\lambda_{n}$. According to the discussion of Sec. 3.2, these nuclei, both of which exhibit oblate shapes, are bound against neutron emission. We will return to this point later.

The most deformed nucleus of the isotope chain is 24Mg with almost the same neutron and proton deformations. At the other end of the chain, due to a large excess of neutrons over protons, significant differences exist between the proton and neutron quadrupole moments. The onset of large deformation in 36Mg causes a decrease of the neutron chemical potential $\lambda_{n}$ with respect to its value in 34Mg. This gives an additional binding of 36Mg, and correspondly to an increase and decrease of the two-neutron separation energies S2n in 36Mg and 38Mg, respectively (see Fig. 6). In experiment [52], these changes are less pronounced and arrive two mass units earlier, giving rise to a small and large decrease of S2n in 34Mg and 36Mg, respectively.

Concerning the ground-state deformation properties (full symbols connected by lines in Fig. 5), the proton drip-line nucleus 20Mg displays a well defined spherical minimum (N=8 is a magic number). Then, there is a competition between prolate (22,24Mg and 36,38,40Mg) and oblate (26,30Mg) deformations, while 28,32Mg are spherical. The last two localized isotopes (with negative Fermi energies), 42,44Mg, display oblate deformations. Secondary minima of the deformation energy curves (isolated symbols) exist for isotopes 22,24,26Mg and 36,38,40Mg.

Non-zero proton pairing correlations are present at all spherical or oblate minima. However, at these shapes, tangible neutron pairing exist only in 22,24Mg and 34,36,38Mg. Moreover, for all nuclei with prolate ground-state shapes, i.e., in 22,24Mg and 36,38,40Mg, both proton and neutron correlations are small or vanish altogether. These results are at variance with the Gogny-pairing HB calculations of Ref. [57], where non-zero pairing exists in all the heavy Mg isotopes. Also, in Ref. [8], stronger pairing correlations were obtained for the zero-range density-dependent pairing force. However, in that study, the strength parameters were not adjusted to odd-even mass staggering but rather taken from high-spin calculations of superdeformed bands. Our results suggest that the pure HFB-pairing approach is not necessarily the best way to treat pairing correlations in the Mg isotopes, and approximate or exact particle-number projection should probably be employed.

At this point, it is worth expanding a bit on the unusual results for 42,44Mg. In these two isotopes, the solutions corresponding to prolate shapes are unstable ( $\lambda_{n}$>0), while those corresponding to oblate shapes continue to be bound, i.e., they have $\lambda_{n}$=-0.253 and -0.092MeV for A=42 and 44, respectively. The bound ground states of these two nuclei are thus oblate, whereas in the lighter isotopes the oblate solutions corresponded to secondary minima. This is the origin of the sudden change in two-neutron separation energies, which become negative in 42Mg and 44Mg (S2n=-2.237 and -1.975MeV, respectively. In the case of 42Mg, however, two-neutron emission should be hindered by the fact that the parent and daughter nuclei have dramatically different shapes, and, by this token, 42Mg may still have a substantial half-life even though it is beyond the two-neutron drip line.

The bottom panel of Fig. 6 shows the neutron and proton rms radii, rn and rp. At the proton drip-line, the neutron rms radii are smaller than the proton rms radii, and then they increase with increasing neutron number. Around 24,26Mg, rn becomes almost equal to rp, and for nuclei close to the neutron drip-line, rn takes significantly larger values than rp. The increase of rn is fairly linear, similarly as in Refs. [8,56,57], and gives no hint of an existence of unusually larger neutron distributions at the neutron drip line (see also the discussion in Refs. [58,59]).


next up previous
Next: Neutron-drip-line calculations Up: Results Previous: Tests of the method
Jacek Dobaczewski
1999-09-13